I have MX80N in my bag now but haven't the time to test it! TK9000 is a really great looking racket - I don't understand why specs are the same as TK6000. Paul www.badminton-coach.co.uk
Pure coincidence. I'd have liked to have seen a bit more diffentiation between this and the 90, to be honest.
Confused me as well, especially when we could just get a 3U TK6000 for less money. Maybe there's some new materials techs in the offing. Who knows.
can someone help on this chart. JS-8 is on the soft (left) side of the chart with 4/5 stiffness and the TK-6000/9000 is on hard (right) side with 3/5 stiffness. The chart indicated to me that the JS-8 is softer to play with? Soft=less stiff, especially when the head is not that heavy on the JS-8. This goes against my understanding or am I totally misunderstood the SOFT side of the chart of being less stiff to play with. Even the MX-80 is less HARD compared to the TK-6000/9000 and from what I remember the MX-80 is super stiff.
Doesn't make sense to compare two rackets with vaguely similar paint jobs much less weight class and specs :/